![]() ![]() He points out that the "one world" paradigm is false, since we do not actually live in a harmonious and universalized society. Huntington analyzes how other existing paradigms fall short. How does Huntington defend his own civilizational paradigm against other possible paradigms for explaining the post-Cold War world? Thus, we should focus on studying them in order to best understand and prevent future international conflicts. ![]() Huntington believes that conflict is most likely between these civilizations. Whereas the major world split used to be between communism and capitalism, it is now between the seven or eight major civilizations and their differing cultures and values. He also believes more specifically than after the Cold War, civilizational differences became more important than ideological ones. For Huntington, the level of the civilization allows for the most productive comparisons between people. These are important distinguishing characteristics between peoples. This means a civilization shares values, cultures, and often religions and languages as well. Huntington defines a civilization as the broadest level of a particular cultural grouping. Why does Huntington focus on the role of civilizations in the post-Cold War world, as opposed to other potential groups or institutions? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |